Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Knowing can be defined as having enlightenment of subject, while learning can be defined as putting knowledge into work. It is likely that some people would agree with the statement, and some don't. However, the knowing about the past cannot really help people to make important decision today but learning obtained from past experience can.
As world moves forward towards technology, it is expected that some problems of humans would probably vanish. However, it is also expected that this flourishment of technology will create new problems that are never encountered by humans before. These unprecedented problems will need new solutions rather than conventional one's as there is saying "Modern problems requires modern solutions". Therefore, it is not likely that past knowing can help in anyways for decision making towards these modern problems in today's world.
Despite of having robust law system at present, it is vulnerable to frequent and prominent changes. This changes in law is likely to occur as a response to newer problems. Some things which are illegal right now could be legal in the future and things which are legal right now could be illegal in the future. Therefore, it is very uncertain to predict these frequent changes in judicial system, and thus any knowledge consisting of past laws cannot be reliably applied in decision making today.
There is very vague difference between the two terms 'knowing' and 'learning'. However, this difference between two tells us lot of things. As it is very ubiquitous for a person to face a situation and not learning from it. A person can be expected to do the same mistake again hence suggesting that the knowing from past is of no use in decision making today.
Though this knowledge from past can be used as experience to make important decision today as famous Sir Thomas Elva Edison did while inventing lightbulb. He failed many times before inventing lightbulb but every time he failed, he learned new concepts and make appropriate decisions for change in the design of the bulb which eventually led him to success. Implying that the experience derived from the past knowing can be use in decision making today.
In conclusion there are enough evidence stating that it is not the 'knowing' that helps people making important decision today but in fact it is 'experience' derived from the that knowing that eventually led and help people to make important decision today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | kalp98403 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | idris oriyomi | 58 | view |
| 2022-05-12 | Millan | 50 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 50
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 50
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 16
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Mer 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Knowing can be defined as having enlight...
^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ould agree with the statement, and some dont. However, the knowing about the past ca...
^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...cision today but learning obtained from past experience can. As world moves forward toward...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g obtained from past experience can. As world moves forward towards technolog...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese modern problems in todays world. Despite of having robust law system at p...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly applied in decision making today. There is very vague difference between t...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of no use in decision making today. Though this knowledge from past can be u...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be use in decision making today. In conclusion there are enough evidence ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1144278607 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63553897551 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1664358259 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.210526316 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232424711588 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761918053511 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777857065339 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135627427932 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655044129036 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.