Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure
that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that
government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Art can manifest in various mediums, including painting, sculpture, music, dance, literature, theater, film, photography, and more. Adequate funding plays a vital role in nurturing and expanding the artistic landscape in various ways. So, I mostly agree with the belief that government funding is necessary to ensure the flourishing of the arts and its accessibility to all people.
Many artistic endeavors would have been struggled to exist unless adequate funding is provided to them. Artist, particularly in marginal communities, often face financial obstacles that impede their ability to focus fully on their artistic creativity. In the late 20th century and onwards, the advent of digital technology has had a profound impact on the arts. The availability of computer, internet, digital tools revolutionized artistic creation. Hence, it compels the artist to be on equal footing to pull through this competitive market. By providing funding, the government can help level the playing field and create opportunities for artists who might otherwise be overlooked or unable to pursue their artistic aspirations.
In addition, for the production of large scale projects which require significant resources’ government funding is required. For instance, ‘Shilpokola art exhibition’ can be organized to showcase and promote artistic talent, cultural diversity and creative expression that create platforms for artist to display their art to wider audience, allowing them to gain recognition and potentially sell their artwork. These funds can be used to cover various expenses associated with organizing an exhibition.
People are not born with equal facilities. The government funding can encourage the people from each background and promote cultural cohesion. It can, thereby, enrich society as a whole by preserving authenticity of traditional art from diverse background. The art can play a vital role in shaping our identity and facilitating the exchange of idea. So government funding can assure that the facilities of art is accessible to everyone.
Some critics argue that government funding can pressurize the integrity of the art. There might be political interference on the freedom of the artist. They claimed that government may dictate the types : aligned with government ideology, national heritage, public opinion which will potentially impede the creativity of the artist. These claims have not been convincingly refuted.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 86
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Art can manifest in various mediums, inc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and its accessibility to all people. Many artistic endeavors would have been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to pursue their artistic aspirations. In addition, for the production of large...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l diversity and creative expression that create platforms for artist to display t...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ociated with organizing an exhibition. People are not born with equal facilitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties of art is accessible to everyone. Some critics argue that government fundi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, may, so, then, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7095890411 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03560642824 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613698630137 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2526174929 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2380952381 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.380952381 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349455571111 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107989811445 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104357902739 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214846413705 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906710775987 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.