The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The bar chart provides information about the global sales of video games for four different platforms, namely mobile phones, online, consoles, and handheld devices, from 2000 to 2006. Overall, except for console games, all digital games increased in 2006. Additionally, online games and mobile phone games had fluctuating sales rankings. And handheld games saw the most significant increase during the period. In 2000, handheld games had the highest worldwide revenue of almost 12 billion dollars, compared to console games, which generated only 6 billion dollars. Handheld games slightly exceeded 12 billion dollars in 2001 and continued to rise to almost 18 billion dollars in 2006, while console games experienced a slight decline to 5 billion dollars, which continued to 3 billion dollars by the end of the period. With regard to other platforms, online games generated less than 1 billion dollars in 2001. In 2002, a new gaming technology called mobile gaming emerged and it generated the same global revenue as online games, at 1 billion dollars each. In the following four years, both platforms significantly increased and exceeded 8 billion dollars and 7 billion dollars respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- The graph gives information about the drinking habits of the US population by age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Task 2 Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 71
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 56
- The diagram below shows a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37967914439 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67893623707 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3955304321 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368707796152 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156875936552 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560086028455 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368707796152 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.