Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Some believe that there are types of old buildings deserve to be conserved while others are not. This essay will explain why buildings possessing both architecteral and practical values should be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the drawbacks.
Premises embellish local landscape and function efficiently should be of the prime priority. There are buildings erected with unique designs which contribute to the facade of certain neighborhoods. This not only makes up the aesthetic cityscape but also attracts visitors, generates more income for local inhabitants. Additionally, some buildings are still playing an important role in accommodating people that are worth the budget for preservation. One case in point is the Vietnamese opera house, which is currently being harnessed to house musical event audience. The expenditure to maintain such buildings is often lower than the cost of demolition and reconstruction that justifies the conservation of them.
Retaining old buildings is not beneficial. One the one hand, there are ancient buildings utilized as exhibition sites of past events and relics of particular regions, which remind denizens of their historical and culteral heritage. Another reason for conserving old constructions is that they can be renovated and reused. This alleviates unnecessary burdens on the local environtment while constructing new buildings. On the other hand, many aged buildings are unable to withstand the test of time. Maintenance and management cost render sustaining those building are futile. If new buildings with up-to-date designs, and state-of-the-art technologies are constructed, they are more worthwhile than squandering on preservation of old buildings. Likewise, as structure of time-worn buiding have deteriorated over time, putting them into use become increasingly dangerous for people.
In sum, architecture and application are two important factors should be taken into account to consider certain building are worth preservation or not. I concur with the view the downsides of keeping old buildings eclipse the merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 89
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ould be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the draw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75796178344 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17911610038 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0174066884 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427068150116 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126442370073 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873801455618 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266873550504 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457738990489 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.