All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Employees are the building blocks of any company. Their wellbeing, their suggestions and their productivity will directly impact the operations of an entity. The given claim elaborates that, to improve the efficiency of the operations in a company, listening to their own employees will eliminate the need to hire consultants who shall suggest ways to operate more efficiently. I agree with the statement, however there might be few circumstances where it is best to hire consultants than depending on the employees. The resons for the same are elaborated below.
To being with, as stated already, employees are the heart of any corporate, be it manufacturing, trading or just a service industry. The indicator of effeciency is the productivy of its employees. They are directly related i.e. to say, increase in productivty means increase in efficiency and increase in efficiency means increas in productivity. To improve such prouctity we go to the internal resources but not seek advices from any external resources. We go the the employees in the organisations, do a "What's working and what's not working" analysis and sort matters to be more productive. For example, the employees of 'XYZ' company are suffering from sleep deprivation, due to the long working hours, so here what's working is the employees dedication and what is not working is the long hours, so a |simple solutions is to reduce the work hours by such calculated amount that will enable the emploes to rest well and therefore work more efficiently, thereby effecting the company as a whole. This way major problems of effectiveness can be solved within the organisation.
|Moreover, it is a general assumption that the employees of of the organisation are hired only if they specialize in the specific field they choose to work. So, if th employee is hired based on his extempore skill set required for that specific job, it is guite obvious that he will have more profundity in such field than an externally hired consultant. For instance, if a software engineer is hired based on his knowledge and experice on a particular computer language say 'Java' and this |consultant who is hired may have ill knowledge of the same, then all the suggestions made by such consultant might not hold feasible. For example, a consultant suggests that the employee shall spend at least 3 hours time off screen, this silly suggestion would drastically reduce the productivity and efficency.
However, there are sitations where hiring a consultant would be a lot beneficial and may even improve the financial conditions of the organisation as a whole. For example, companies can hire tax consultants, who can help and advice the company majory to save tax. They may give various alternatives on the way the company can Isave tax infact save a lot of money in the end. This will only more and better money allocation for employee welfare and other beneficial activites. In this case |alone, the employees of a software company (for example) may not have technical knowledge in the field of tax saving so it is advisable to hire external consultants.
IOn a conclusive notes, it is best to say that the lising to your employess wil Isolve most of the issues relating to operational efifciency, but it is unavoidable t take the suggestions of consultants who are specilized in specific fields., like those of tax consultants or finanical management consultants. The given claim thus holds true such cases where the efficiency of the work is in question, but in relation to other matters the statement may not always hold right.
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 58
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have filed a 68
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
... for the same are elaborated below. To being with, as stated already, employees are ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ices from any external resources. We go the the employees in the organisations, do a &a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ices from any external resources. We go the the employees in the organisations, do a &a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the employees in the organisations, do a 'Whats working and whats not worki...
^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...loyees in the organisations, do a 'Whats working and whats not working' ana...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...nisations, do a 'Whats working and whats not working' analysis and sort mat...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... due to the long working hours, so here whats working is the employees dedication and...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 743, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ing hours, so here whats working is the employees dedication and what is not working is t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...a general assumption that the employees of of the organisation are hired only if they...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'note'?
Suggestion: note
...external consultants. IOn a conclusive notes, it is best to say that the lising to y...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e t take the suggestions of consultants who are specilized in specific fields., like th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2994.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04890387858 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0132524387 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475548060708 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 957.6 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.928250227 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.173913043 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7826086957 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349750490894 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898096212724 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059539791068 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187245263576 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609559943977 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.