“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
In a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics' magazine, it is stated that, they should invest their resources in unmanned space flight. They have come to this conclusion based on the issue they have been facing due to the use of Manned space flight, which is costly and dangerous. Although, the cited evidence seems logical and probable, but the assumption on which it relies do not lend support to argument, so before this recommendation cam be properly evaluated, three questions must be answered.
First of all, what is the cost associated to invent the Unmanned space flight. In simple words, is it probable to assume the same cost for the development of this space flight as manned space flight? It is possible the cost requires to invent this space flight may be different - perhaps, manned space flight can be developed in low price than another. As well as, due to the high cost required for unmanned space flight, there may be rejection to invest resources for unmanned space flight. If either of these scenarios have merit, then the conclusion drawn in the argument is significantly undermined.
In addition to this, does the reliability of data or information gained by both space flight same. In simple terms, can the data gathered by one space flight more accurate than another space flight: It may not happen like this. The accuracy of data may vary. May be the data which is received by manned space flight is more reliable and is more accurate than that of unmanned space flight, so, as result, manned space flight can be given more emphasis than unmanned space flight: In order to reduce risk of manned space flight, they may invest their resources to increase the quality of the manned space flight. If the above is true, then the argument doesn't hold water.
Lastly, though, it does not have any risk while sending the men and women on the space. is it appropriate to assume only due to this reason, they are free of risk? In other words, what, if, manned space flight is more dangerous while coming back from space than going to the space, so without answer to this question, they may have doubt and they may dissuade to invest in another space flight - unmanned space flight. Hence, there is no evidence for the aforementioned question, which eventually weakens the argument.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumption; If the author is able to answer the aforementioned three question and offer more evidence (perhaps in the form of a systematic research study), then it will be possible to fully evaluate the viability of the proposed recommendation to invest the resources in unmanned space flight.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 66
- 4 Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances such as refrigerators and air conditioners that are almost twice as energy efficient as thos 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities 70
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'inventing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: inventing
...light? It is possible the cost requires to invent this space flight may be different - pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...his. The accuracy of data may vary. May be the data which is received by manned sp...
^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...If the above is true, then the argument doesnt hold water. Lastly, though, it does...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
...sending the men and women on the space. is it appropriate to assume only due to th...
^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'offer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'offers'.
Suggestion: offers
...r the aforementioned three question and offer more evidence perhaps in the form of a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 462.0 441.139720559 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88528138528 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57790243562 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445887445887 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.2830350555 57.8364921388 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.388888889 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355858450874 0.218282227539 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131932235064 0.0743258471296 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102795617086 0.0701772020484 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21430852846 0.128457276422 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916708320934 0.0628817314937 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'inventing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: inventing
...light? It is possible the cost requires to invent this space flight may be different - pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...his. The accuracy of data may vary. May be the data which is received by manned sp...
^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...If the above is true, then the argument doesnt hold water. Lastly, though, it does...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
...sending the men and women on the space. is it appropriate to assume only due to th...
^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'offer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'offers'.
Suggestion: offers
...r the aforementioned three question and offer more evidence perhaps in the form of a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 462.0 441.139720559 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88528138528 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57790243562 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445887445887 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.2830350555 57.8364921388 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.388888889 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355858450874 0.218282227539 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131932235064 0.0743258471296 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102795617086 0.0701772020484 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21430852846 0.128457276422 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916708320934 0.0628817314937 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.