Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers.
Students and teachers are things that come and go together in educational context. ‘Teachers teach, students takes’ is a cliché that we always hear. However, it’s still equivocal when it comes to a weight of responsibility for education. The prompt states that teachers are more responsible than students. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this statement for the following 2 reasons.
Firstly, students themselves are the final and most important factor in their success. No one is responsible for another one’s success. Only you are responsible for yourself. For example, as a kid I always hated chemistry and I knew that it was just not for me. I didn’t understand 90% of the things that the teacher taught me. However, I realized that if I failed chemistry, it would affect my overall GPA which was important for my college application. Thus, I knew that I needed to read more and take my own time to study. It would be irrational to blame my teacher that his teaching is ineffective while I just sit and do nothing. Blaming won’t help but putting more effort will.
Secondly, responsibility is intangible. Therefore, unmeasurable. It’s unfeasible to weigh ‘responsibility’ accurately because it is subjected to one’s judgement. For example, let’s say a student has one big duty which is to learn, and a teacher has one big duty which is to teach. How do we weigh ‘to learn’ and ‘to teach’? Students might say teaching skill is more important than learning because if the teaching style is dull, even the brightest student won’t be able to tolerate and listen to it. Yet, in teachers’ perspective, teachers might argue that even though how good they prepare their materials for the class, apathy students still pay no attention to them. Moreover, even those students’ parents can’t even control their children, not to mention teachers. Once something is intangible, there is, no doubt, a lot of opinions and arguments because it’s subjective. Thus, it’s impossible to find an accurate weight on an intangible thing such as responsibility.
In conclusion, it’s undeniable that teachers must, indeed, provide the best and relevant knowledge to their classes but it’s not true that they are more liable on students’ education as mentioned in two reasons above. Essentially, it’s impossible to weigh those intangible responsibilities and conclude that one party has more duty than another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2024-04-12 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | sami18 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
- The ancient Oppo tribe has long been thought to have hunted only with wooden spears because none of their cave paintings depict bows or arrows Recently however flint arrowheads have been found among fossilized bones of ibex animals thought to be a staple 79
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers 50
- In surveys Mason city residents rank water sports swimming boating fishing among their favorite recreational activities The mason river flowing through this city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city devotes less of its budget to maintain 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23604060914 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02995195991 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0678810832 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.52 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.76 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458956052703 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106571401486 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080393610548 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296470153835 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367584947408 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.