The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart depicts the percentage of men, women and children in the UK consuming the amount of recommended fruit and vegetables on a daily basis in three separated years: 2002, 2006, 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the amount of fruit and vegetables consumed by women was always the highest among three whereas the opposite trend was for children. In addition, there was a slight fluctuation in the consumption of fruit and vegetables in all three mentioned subjects.
As mentioned to men and women, in 2002, the amount of fruit and vegetables consumed by women took up 25%, meanwhile in 2006 this rate rose up sharply and peaked at 32% which accounted for the highest. Up to 2010, there was a steep tank down of this percentage to 27%. Followed by this was the amount of fruit and vegetables eaten by men, which rank the second at 22%. The year 2006 witnessed a dramatic roar to 28% in men’s fruit and vegetables consumption. However, four years later saw a slight plunge by 4% in the fruit and vegetables consumption of this sex.
Turning to the children, in 2002 the number of children in the UK who consumed fruit and vegetables daily was 11%, the lowest. But later, this figure slightly rose up to 16% in 2006, the highest. After going up, the amount of fruit and vegetables eaten by children sank steeply to 14% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Chloe Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Cicihg | view | |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 70 | view |
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64315352697 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52402242658 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477178423237 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4521817567 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388694886864 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164366038472 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120180925136 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290096791671 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126997076594 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64315352697 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52402242658 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477178423237 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4521817567 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388694886864 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164366038472 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120180925136 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290096791671 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126997076594 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.