We learn through direct experience; to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all.
There is no doubt that science and technology has become part and parcel of our life and it is not possible to predict our life without technical devices. Most of the masses are of the view that science and technology is capable of replenishing all the problems prevailing in our society. I strongly disagree to this viewpoint because I believe that although science has done lots of progress in our day to day life, but if delves deep inside then many of the problems in our society are caused by its advancement.
One reason for my belief is that with the advancement of technology it has also caused many harmful effects to our environment. To elucidate, many poisonous substances have been released into the environment in our day to day life which causes many serious effects like global warming and leads to hazardous diseases like cancer etc. For instance, many areas of world are facing the issue of drought and floods these days because of indifference created by these pollutants to our environment. Therefore, science and technology has created myriad number of problems to our nature.
On one hand, science and technology has made our life very easy and comfortable that anything can be done with a single click and it has made lots of development in various sectors like medical, education etc. On the other hand, its developments has also provided lots of harm to our society like the creation of nuclear bombs which causes lots of destruction in our lives. There are many instances in which the development of science and technology has put the life of Homo sapiens to risk. To exemplify, COVID 19 is one of the pandemic which is caused by the uneven developments of science and had caused destruction to the human lives in abundance. Thus, science and technology has caused large number of harmful effects to the human beings.
Perhaps, the overriding reason for my belief is that it has also created difference among the society especially between rich and poor and has risen up the crime in the society. Rich being capable of taking advantages of the advancements of science may turn from one technology to the other within a short period, while poor in contrast not able to afford these gadgets feel dejected and frustrated and as a consequence indulge in some offensive activities to have all these comforts. For example, according to a survey by Times of India, snatching activities have surged by about 70% person in past two years and most of the snatchers indulged are youth.
For all these reasons, I believe that even if science and technology is able to resolve many issues but at the same time it has become the cause of large number of problems of our society. Hence, there is a need to have appropriate use of these technologies to avoid their harmful effects
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 63
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your 58
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and place of the offence To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 73
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81288981289 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66150270155 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449064449064 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4315200574 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.176470588 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2941176471 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0213313299313 0.243740707755 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00884024261351 0.0831039109588 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0172834701846 0.0758088955206 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0175265460113 0.150359130593 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173280060857 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.