Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many people argue that the money invested in technological development is not needed. There are many beneficial ways to spend this money. In my opinion, I partly agree with this statement and I will discuss my view below.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why space exploration is important and justifies the investment of resources. Firstly, space exploration has led to many technological advancements that have practical applications on Earth. Especially in the fields of medicine, transportation and communication, it is really helpful and brings many benefits to the population. For instance, NASA’s research into human physiology in space has led to new treatments for pathological and other diseases. Secondly, exploring space has the potential to inspire future generations of scientists and foster innovation and creativity. Space exploration can provide an incentive to think outside the box and tackle complex problems. People who have a motivation and fully extended grasp about space can deal with dangers or seek cures for humans.
On the other hand, the government should sponsor other projects. Not all countries have space exploration programmes and are not economically strong, so it really squanders when this country makes a decision to invest in this program. Instead of putting financial resources in the big project, political leaders should spend money for other fields such as education, health, and environment. In education, for example, some countries should have an educational reform on course curriculum, it can have a plural sight and cognition switch for both teachers and students who will be more beneficial about this. Or with the environment, they should use regenerative recycled or sustainable materials and minimize garbage’s impact because it can pose a threat to the environment
To sum up, it is significant to recognize that the government should spend money on space exploration. Conversely, it is also important that the political leaders should also put financial resources into other fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015 78
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 56
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to the cinema in one European country on different days 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 834, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l with dangers or seek cures for humans. On the other hand, the government should...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 775, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it can pose a threat to the environment To sum up, it is significant to recogniz...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52351097179 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07670309662 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.188149586 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291404633304 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100791847903 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807065854515 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171420870013 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712391075319 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.