the plans below show how the community centre looked like ten years ago, before it was redesigned, and how it looks now
The two maps depict changes in the layout of a community center over a ten-year period.
Overall, the community center has been significantly reconstructed and renovated after ten years, while some minor features have remained unchanged.
The 100-seat hall in the building's center, which occupies the most space, has remained unchanged over the ten-year period. A toilet has been added to the north, reducing the size of the adjacent storage room by half. The garden to the west of this center has been demolished to make way for an indoor sports facility, but the parking lot remains.
According to the map, four office rooms and the storage room have been replaced with a coffee bar. While the working area has been relocated to the coffee shop's original location, the storage room has been completely demolished. Finally, the southern entrance and reception area, as well as the kitchen on the southeast side of the building, remain unaltered.
- the maps show changes in a city in 1950 and now 78
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their friends and families Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- water system in australia now and in the future 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58147957921 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2484567313 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.058251336851 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285553279725 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399155244419 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505240518779 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405177526225 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.