The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate how employed people spent their time on a variety of activities between 1958 and 2005, in a particular country.
Overall, working adults in this particular country spent most of the time in day for working in 1958, while the figure for travelling to work was the lowest position in the same period. In addition, the number of people who spent a day for sleeping and working was nearly the same. After 50 years, the relationship between working and sleeping witnessed a significant change.
In 1958, most adult used the time in day at work, at around 33% whereas sleeping recorded at the second rank, with 32%. This figure for these two categories had a small minority and no differences. Moreover, the number of people spending time for going out was 19%, twice as much as those who used time for relaxing at home with family. Besides, other activities recorded at a small number, just 6% while the average percentage for travelling at work just around 2% which was regarded as very minor.
In 2008, the relationship between the number of people spending time at work and those who used a day for sleeping witnessed a significant change. Furthermore, the average percentage of working section increased slightly from 33% to 42%, while sleeping saw a downward trend in this period, just 25%. Relaxing at home had a considerable change, as twice as much going out, at 6% and 13%, respectively. Finally, more people spent time for travelling at home and other the percentage of those used their time for hobbies remained unchange after a long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Young people are committing more crimes Discuss the causes and solutions for this problem 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople spending time at work and those who used a day for sleeping witnessed a sign...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, second, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8624535316 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62775585129 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453531598513 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4744164186 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140547270023 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660059581752 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588155729841 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114678795412 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488685894702 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.