It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a growing consensus on the allocation of governmental budgets to encouraging a healthy lifestyle to reduce the potential of ailments instead of treatment for individuals who are already diagnosed with diseases. I personally disagree with this statement as both of the actions hold equal significance.
Initially, a healthy lifestyle may contribute enormously to disease prevention. Recent studies have shown that the majority of young individuals are prone to illnesses due to their sedentary lifestyles. This means that if they cultivate healthy habits such as doing exercise and limiting sugar intake, their immunities against diseases are likely to strengthen. This scheme has received a huge endorsement from politicians across different nations. A prime example of them is Spain with most citizens having healthy lifestyle habits. The country has recorded a relatively low rate of COVID-19 cases, which is considered to result from the Spanish's healthy diet.
However, expenditure on possible treatments cannot be ignored due to the potential transmission of viruses. In 2019, a virus named corona first took place in a Chinese city. The quantity of patients was so large that the hospitals cannot handle all of them, which acted as a catalyst for the worldwide spread of such viruses. This past event has justified the view that efficient treatment is the primary contributor to the public's good health. As prominently observed in the pandemic, despite a large proportion of money devoted to vaccines, the virus evolved and became even more destructive. If the Chinese government had sponsored the finding for treatments to such a disease in the first place, it would not have had the opportunity to go across international borders. Subsequently, there would have been far less deaths and other countries would not have suffered any economic deterioration.
In conclusion, I believe that promoting healthy lifestyles and providing treatments to individuals who are suffering from illnesses are equally important. It is advisable for the governments to actively propose certain incentives to encourage healthy habits among the civilians and provide finding for studies on the treatment of diseases that are currently incurable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 84
- Some people believe that international free car days are effective ways to reduce air pollution However the others argue that there are several ways that are more effective Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- People these days watch TV films and other programs alone rather than with other people Do the advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Atomic energy is becoming more and more popular energy source However some people argue that nuclear power puts life on Earth to danger What is your opinion 89
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun deaths is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...Subsequently, there would have been far less deaths and other countries would not ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, in conclusion, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50724637681 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0169638701 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8054048584 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.764705882 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165538541319 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493462460988 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524261877728 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104728554738 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372403672702 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.