In recent years,.many local stops have closed because customers
travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.
Is this? a. positive or negative development?
In the 20th century, it is observed that people prefer to visit big malls in lieu of local shops. Due to this change, the owner of the small shops wind up their business. In my view, it has more negative impact rather than positive.
Firstly, closure of regional stores leads to reduction as well as the loss of employment. It is noticed that, If any local outlet is closed, then it will not only take away the position of the people working in-person but also seize the job from the local craftsman. Hence, closing of local stores will make local people unemployed. Secondly, shut down of any native trade will make the local art to vanish. As the people will visit the huge malls, they might purchase trendy things instead of local masterpieces. Therefore, the higher purchase of the globally accepted item will make it difficult for the local art to survive.
Even more, the end up of any local shop is an example of the loss of local charm. The local shops mostly contains the local craft that identify the specification of that area, and if it gets closed then the local items would not be available at any other places. So, it will affect the beauty of the local area.
On the contrary side, big malls promotes globalization which in later will support the GDP of any country. For instance, if the forign investor observe that there are huge malls and the people of the specific region likes to purchase international items, then they would like to set their business in the specific country. Hence, the development of foriegn trade will lead to higher purchase following the increase in the GDP of the particular country.
To conclude, local business closure take away the charm of the market, employment from the people, and snatch away the local art which proves to be deductive progress for any country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | aleema | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | nahal | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | bkhatri | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-18 | Lighthouse | view |
- You rescently organised an all day meeting meeting for your company which took place in a local hotel In their feedback participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch Write a lette 73
- Young couples nowadays prefer to have fever children than previous generations Most of them prefer to accomplish other goals in their life first Is it a positive or negative development 61
- You have recently attended a professional course Write a letter to your manager to thank him her for the opportunity and say What was it about Explain why it was helpful to you Suggest other co workers participate in this course 81
- Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere while others believe this is just the price of fame Discuss both sides and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and incl 61
- Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere while others believe this is just the price of fame Discuss both sides and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and incl 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, as well as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7358490566 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38166393273 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9960138685 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172267364444 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062887145104 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456704966519 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102354835961 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052785625858 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, as well as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7358490566 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38166393273 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9960138685 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172267364444 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062887145104 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456704966519 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102354835961 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052785625858 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.