People believe that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful. Others say that those who contribute to society like scientists, teacher are the most successful. Discuss both and give your opinion?
Multiple people reckon that individuals obtaining a lucrative job are exemplary models of the most successful while others claim that successful criteria should rely on their contribution to society like scientists or teachers. In my judgement, I fervently advocate the former sentiment although the latter one can be justified to certain extents.
Admittedly, I concur that those who gain an immense amount of money are the most successful. Firstly, tremendous properties can stand a better chance for them to indulge in life. Specifically, they can afford luxuries services such as opulent outfits, business suits ỏ shopping without any hesitation. As a result, they could be a typical admiration for people to pursue being. Secondly, along with their abundant assets, they virtually have high social status. Consequently, they have certain influence on the community, for instance raising funds for charity or supporting underprivileged people. Overall, becoming wealthy can not only be a great chance to deserve yourselves but also bring multiple merits for the society. Therefore, this practice should be an ideal measurement for success.
In contrast, people devoting their career for society like scientists and teachers also should be recognised as successful. To be more accurate, these missions of vocational careers are sharing knowledge and legacy with society. People in these fields are inclined to devote all of their time to contribute to our society. Thereby, their reputation seemingly gains traction and disseminates to various people. This could be rewarded as a valuable life but it is a price that they may not be wealthy enough.
To sum up, though being a teacher or scientist can be recognised as successful in certain aspects, I show my strong bias for securing a lucrative job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | quan12341234 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | wwwdung | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | wwwdung | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | nguyenphambangtam. | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | dinhthu05 | 93 | view |
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities To what extent do you agree o 67
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities To what extent do you agree o 67
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 56
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be an ideal measurement for success. In contrast, people devoting their caree...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42756183746 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91580462613 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625441696113 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4044094159 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168453193529 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542394814865 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853877358915 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116260404836 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670141256764 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.