Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The statement believed that recant the policy of evaluation of professors by students would secure graduates a better job as employers distrust the dramatic increasing grades after this policy. They also cited the example of Alpha University who did not haing such policy resulted in better outcome in employment to support such opine. However, before inserting such conclusion that the cancling policy lead better career outcome without such policy, there are three questions need to be further supported by evidnce for a tenable conclusion.
The first ambiguous question, that if the Alpha University is better than Omega university as a result of the policy, or it is better even before the policy was implemented, need to be further elaborated with evidence of how those two universities were before and after the policy. This is crutial in determining if the policy lead the regress in employment. If the Alpha universities are a world-leading universities at very beginning while the Omega university is just commonplace one, and the gap in career outcome shrinked after the policy, the argument would be weaken in face of such evidence. On contrary, if the evidence shows that the Omega university falls behind the Alpha university only after the policy, it would augment the claim.
Even it is undubious that it is the policy lead the career outcome declined sharply, we still need further evidence on if canceling it would let the professors to give apt marks to students that will reflect their academic achievements. If there are experiments revealing that the professors may still giving students such high marks as they are told that the students' evaluation has been canceled, then the employees still will hold such bias that the grades by this university is fake and therefore reluctant offer them work opportunities. Therefore such evidence would still weaken the argumet.
Lastly, more evidence are need in terms of proving if the companies are willing to hire students from Omega Universites, noticing such a declining in their grades, given the condition that their professors would restore the grade scale after the policy was canceled. As the recruitment team may have accustomed to the inflated grades from them, a sharp descending in their grades may lead companies to consider. those students are not as astute as previous cohort instead of the grades are now reflecting their true ability. If such evidence are confirmed, canceling this policy would only the precipitate the adverse effect as the argument suggest and this would weaken the policy.
In conclusion, it would be wise to pore into the detail evidence of this argument that canceling the evaluation for professors could lead to better career outcome.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | shubham1102 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | fangzr2 | 58 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | devansh66 | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | devansh66 | 66 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the mayor of Wistfold A recent study revealed that the number of children requiring medical attention for illnesses in our town is 40 percent higher than in the neighboring town of Champsfield Last year the Cham 66
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ch high marks as they are told that the students evaluation has been canceled, then the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eluctant offer them work opportunities. Therefore such evidence would still weaken the ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
... grades may lead companies to consider. those students are not as astute as previous ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 443.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20767494357 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71978024328 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442437923251 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3932458679 57.8364921388 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.8 119.503703932 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5333333333 23.324526521 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193735097812 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076586050908 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581461445427 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115936917676 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552393720674 0.0628817314937 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.3799401198 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 98.500998004 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ch high marks as they are told that the students evaluation has been canceled, then the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eluctant offer them work opportunities. Therefore such evidence would still weaken the ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
... grades may lead companies to consider. those students are not as astute as previous ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 443.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20767494357 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71978024328 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442437923251 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3932458679 57.8364921388 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.8 119.503703932 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5333333333 23.324526521 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193735097812 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076586050908 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581461445427 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115936917676 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552393720674 0.0628817314937 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.3799401198 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 98.500998004 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.