Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people?
Nowadays, most celebrities get paid a lot of money based on their fame. The amount of money they own every month can be many times higher than that of people working in offices or ordinary jobs. In my view, I strongly agree with this opinion. In this essay, I will explain my views based on my own knowledge.
There are some reasons why it makes sense for celebrities to be paid more than others. First, they have very special talents and abilities. Those are the things that make them special. Additionally, with that special ability, they have to go through a lot of arduous training and constantly strive to keep up with the trends of the times. Secondly, not only do they get paid monthly, but they can also earn money by going to events. Celebrities work as ambassadors for famous brands, through which they get paid to advertise at events large and small. Moreover, being a celebrity is not easy because their lives are not private because of the paparazzi and false rumours. They have to sacrifice a lot to dedicate themselves to the arts.
However, it is not entirely reasonable for a star to be paid too much. It is not equal for a celebrity to make so much money in one month. Each profession has its own pressure and requires its own ability and effort, so every industry needs equality. Furthermore, taking celebrities too seriously and paying too much for them is both wasteful and puts a lot of pressure on them. Most people will use the money to spend it on useless purposes like branded items, even though they can spend thousands of dollars just on one item. Not stopping there, when celebrities are paid too much, they will have to do what they can to please the brand or companies they represent. When they have a bit of a scandal, their careers are almost empty.
In conclusion, it's true that celebrities make a lot of money when they really try. This is really not wrong when a person is properly paid for their efforts and what they dedicate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | TLan168 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | dora20070206 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Yến Phạm04 | 78 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The line graph compares the percentage of people living in four Asian counties in the world between 1970 and 2040
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making compar 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59206798867 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43618815361 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524079320113 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9379957591 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1904761905 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175345564002 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599747923128 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057186820584 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121068269276 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011095907733 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.