The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
The provided bar chart illustrates the fluctuation in the number of US families in terms of their yearly salaries, spanning in three years of 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that while the two income rates from 50 million to 99,999 dollars experienced a nearly stability over those years survey, there was a slight fluctuation in the number of households in the US earning less than 49,999 and over 100,000 annually.
According to the given chart, it is noticeable that the number of households earning between 50,000 and 74,999 each year in the US remained stable, with around 20 million families in all three years 2007, 2011 and 2015. Similarly, there was a slight change in the number of US homes in the income rate from 75,000 to 99,999 annually, accounting for 15 million households in 2007 and 2015 coming after a moderate decline of 1 million families in 2011.
On the other hand, the highest salary of 100,000 and more accounted for approximately 30 million families in 2007, which was the most popular compared to the four rates. However, moving to 2011, this highest salary saw a remarkable decline to around 23 million households and rated the third in comparison, surpassed by the rise in the number of families earning less than 49,999 dollars, with 29 million homes receiving less than 25,000 annually and 30 million those earning between 25,000 and 49,999. Otherwise, those who got the highest income of 100,000 achieved again its highest popularity in 2015 at approximately 33 million families, which was at the expense of the other four salary rates.
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
- many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar 89
- it is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvatages 61
- Many people like to eat unhealthy food even though they know it s bad for them Why is this What is an effective way to improve people s healthy eating habits 84
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('stability') instead of another adjective.
...0 million to 99,999 dollars experienced a nearly stability over those years survey, there was a sl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning between 50,000 and 74,999 each year in the US remained stable, with around 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93632958801 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56062022569 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49063670412 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.701415868 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.285714286 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1428571429 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262140722299 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14859416243 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964025355312 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19858793265 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997000433051 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('stability') instead of another adjective.
...0 million to 99,999 dollars experienced a nearly stability over those years survey, there was a sl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning between 50,000 and 74,999 each year in the US remained stable, with around 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93632958801 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56062022569 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49063670412 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.701415868 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.285714286 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1428571429 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262140722299 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14859416243 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964025355312 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19858793265 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997000433051 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.