There is an argument that governments should not limit the development of scientific researches in any possible field. I believe I mostly agree with such position, only with few exceptions. I will try to explain reasons why I mostly support this view in below paragraphs.
Before addressing the reasons why we should not interfere with advancements in science, I want to mention exceptional case where control over it is necessary. I believe it is logical to argue that development of mass destruction weapons was one of the main mistakes of human civilization. For example, invention of atomic bombs and hydrogen bombs could have been prevented if governments instead of boosting their researches financially by supplying scientists’ labs with dangerous amount uranium, simply restricted them. Thus, I believe scientific developments of weapons which can threaten the existence of human civilization should be restricted.
However, in most cases restricting ongoing research programs will only prolong the time to achieve set goals. For example, during seventeenth and eighteenth century, existing orthodox beliefs about our solar system and harsh criticism against astronomic scientists such as Galileo, prevented pivotal discoveries from being researched further. Thus, governmental interference proved to a barrier during this age.
Another modern example can be given regarding the issue of creating clones of certain animals. Due to moral principles, it was prohibited for scientists to continue the research in early 2000s. However, after scientific community proved the necessity of clone creation, for finding the ways of cloning human organs governmental restrictions limiting the research of the project got deleted.
In conclusion, although in case of mass destruction weapons, researches should be limited or even stopped, where there is a chance of saving a human life, or a chance to learn more about astronomy exists, governments should provide their full support.
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things 58
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist quot Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villag 67
- 23 Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- 1 quot Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists 039 lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65217391304 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03079794402 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635451505017 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0966531032 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270039427257 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856437900155 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995930783164 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141662819185 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604234085991 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.