The chart above shows information about various professions in the U.K. and their salaries. The table shows the average working hours per week for each profession
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart provides information on the starting salary and increment after 3 years for four professions (Police, Nurse, Firefighter and Underground Driver) in the UK and the table gives information about the weekly working hours for each of these professions.
Overall, although the average working hour of underground drivers is the least, but their starting salary is the highest among the 4 professions. In addition, the average working hours per week of the firefighters are the longest and the salary for the profession of nurse are the least.
The underground drivers have the least working hours which is 36 hours per week. In comparison, their starting salary is very high (50000 pounds) and their increment after 3 years is 1000 pounds. On the contrary, the nurses work 2 hours more than the underground drivers per week (38 hours). But their starting income is 18000 pounds, which is less than half of what the underground drivers are paid. Regardless, their increment in salary after three years is the same 1000 pounds in 3 years.
Moreover, the police forces work slightly longer than the nurses per week, and as a result their wage is also slightly higher than the nurses at 21000 pounds. But, unlike the other two professions, their salary after 3 years increases by 2000 pounds. Lastly, weekly working hour for the firefighters are the longest and their salary is almost double the salary of the nurse and the police as well, which is 40000 pounds. and their increment just like the nurse and underground drivers is 1000 pound in 3 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | ngannguyen2408 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-11 | chacamutia | view | |
| 2023-05-11 | chacamutia | view | |
| 2023-05-09 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 70
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 67
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 70
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 50
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... police as well, which is 40000 pounds. and their increment just like the nurse and...
^^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...e nurse and underground drivers is 1000 pound in 3 years.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, moreover, so, well, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93511450382 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55490663791 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435114503817 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1890807134 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281227160775 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126037829164 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103536175294 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226225275887 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946056457489 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.