Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Leaders must have a variety of abilities and qualities so that people become loyal followers. One of the most important characteristics of a leader is to mantain the respect of his or her peers because if people feel respected they will trust their leaders more.
Studies have shone that subordinates who feel respected by their boss preform better at their daily tasks. This happens because people feel that their job is valued and relevant. In this sense people who are respect by their leader take on more difficult tasks because they feel acomplished by the aproval of their leader. An examaple of this is the former president of Colombia Alvaro Uribe Velez who during its goverment excecuted the plan to take Colomabia back from the insurgent army. In his regime he congratulated the generals of the armed forces publicly, and this made the miltary focused on excecuting the plan. During his time as president Colombia was the safest it had ever been.
Even though having moral judgement is an important characteristic as a leader because this will translate on to better desitions, it is not as important as respect of their peers. People who feel respectes and valued will execute the orders better even if they do not agree with them. An example of this behavior in history is what happend in Germany in World War II. Hitler was a radical leader who believed in the extermination of the jews to make Germany better, even if the comanding officers of his regime did not agree with him, they follow orders to create the extermination camps because he respected them and praised them.
In conlcusion, people who feel respected and valued by their supperios follow orders better even though they dont agree with the leaders moral judgment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...lued and relevant. In this sense people who are respect by their leader take on more di...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s follow orders better even though they dont agree with the leaders moral judgment. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9222972973 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57512889108 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503378378378 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1675725073 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.076923077 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 5.21951772744 9% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26684415703 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103434929493 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108179764695 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191409731762 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088660020165 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.