In the past, important knowledge about history and culture was stored in museums. However, today, people can see everything on the internet without paying any money. Therefore, we no longer need museums.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
One school of thought holds that with the proliferation of information on the Internet, people can effortlessly view everything they wish, including historical and cultural knowledge, without charge, so it is no longer necessary to keep museums. While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I would argue that museums will still be irreplaceable.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that museums will be redundant. The primary reason is that the Internet provides people with numerous materials and information sources related to history and culture without requiring them to travel long distances to museums. For instance, simply with a click of a button, they can have an image of various artifacts from different historical periods, possibly expanding their history knowledge. However, it is crucial to note that this online knowledge cannot be presented as fully and professionally as museums do.
On the other hand, I am convinced that museums will still have a role to play. First, it is worth mentioning that museums can stimulate economic growth. They might attract millions of tourists from around the world visiting museums and other places of interest. By selling museum entrance tickets and offering tourist services, the local businesses can foster the development of the economy. Take, for example, the J. Paul Getty Trust Museum in Los Angeles, the United States of America. It generates a substantial amount of revenue per year, contributing billions to the city’s economy. Moreover, museums are of paramount importance to people’s physical experience, as seen in how they directly explore and observe artifacts, long-standing statues, and artworks, resulting in a more proper and comprehensive perspective on historical knowledge. To be more specific, unverified information floating around the Internet might lead to some misunderstandings, such as people’s mistaken views and information about historical figures and events, which strengthens the arguments that keeping museums is still an important task.
In conclusion, while there are justifications that the Internet will marginalize physical museums, I would contend that the former will remain essential in the future, considering their important roles in developing economies and individuals’ better understanding of knowledge about history and culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | imvietnamese | 77 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individuals and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 89
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarize the information by selecting and report 84
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69295774648 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13473921759 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.9519676396 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.3125 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253649546353 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764984508862 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422258091262 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155236356701 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448332776523 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.