The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart compares the percentage of people who eat fast food restaurants in the United State of America in six period of time between 2003 and 2013.
It is obvious that the percentage of American people who have ate fast food restaurants both once a week and once or twice a month are more than other groups from 2003 to 2013.
As can be seen there are six groups of people which are fast food restaurants in different period of times. Not only have on 4 percent the people of America but also there was another group that never eat fast food under 5 percent between 2003 and 2013. Eating fast food in several times a week has more than 15 percent and it increased about 5 percent in 2006 and reduced approximately 4 percent in 2013. Third group that include people who ate fast food once a week has more than 30 percent in 2003, but after that increase in 2006 fall around 7 percent in 2013. Although people have ate fast foot once or twice a month reduce in 2006, it increased more than 9 percent in 2013. A few times a year is another group that exist and it increased in 2006 and did not change in 2013.
Totally there was the maximum percent related to once a week in 2006 and once or twice a month in 2013, while the minimum percent related to every day group in 2006 and 2013.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes pf travel in England between 1985 and 2000 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s in the United State of America in six period of time between 2003 and 2013. It is obvious t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
... percentage of American people who have ate fast food restaurants both once a week ...
^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...7 percent in 2013. Although people have ate fast foot once or twice a month reduce ...
^^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to everyday'?
Suggestion: to everyday
...2013, while the minimum percent related to every day group in 2006 and 2013.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26016260163 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12921225988 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414634146341 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.8842971286 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293875888328 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166794812069 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881824607846 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215924660062 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101754810815 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.32 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.