We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
When humans come together and interact amongst themselves, share ideas, experiences and lessons, the tendency for friction, disagreements and conflict is ever-present; however, that must not be a stumbling block to the fulfilment of shared goals. If I agree completely with every view shared by my circle of friends or colleagues that would be a source of worry for me. It speaks to a lack of diversity in thinking and that is something that must not only be discouraged but abhorred. I disagree strongly with the prompt above and my reasons will be discussed further below.
In the scientific community, surrounding oneself with yes men and those that only reinforce your pre-conceived notions is a recipe for disaster. When no one is there to say no to even the most outlandish experiments or hypothesis, dangerous things can happen. Take for instance the Chinese scientist that in 2018 revealed that he had edited the genes of twins in-vitro to make them taller and more resistant to HIV-AIDS. This brought about worldwide condemnation and outrage, not only because of the nature of the experiments but also the fact that he did not follow peer-review processes and went ahead to publish his unethical work. This is one of the reasons for the peer-review process, which allows different scientists from around the world with opposing views from yours go through and examine your work.
The political landscape is one of the most volatile and polarizing in today’s age of misinformation and groupthink. Many people now do not want to even associate with those who possess different political views or ideals from them, shunning them in family meetings or worse, resorting to violence. This sort of thinking has seeped into the collective mind. How then do we expect the lawmakers that we elect to interact with themselves and create laws and policies that will affect our day-to-day lives? We must encourage a two-way exchange of ideas and information in all spheres of office and lives. The information gleaned might just save the nation or society at large. We must not encourage bubble living that only reinforces our own beliefs, but must step out and venture into the real world with vigor to argue our case but be ready to change our opinions.
The familiar landscape is one that is inherently important to the functioning of our society and more often than not what occurs in our homes spills out into the world at large. Parents must be able to look inwards at what values they possess and what values they aim to instill in their children as they go out into the world. The viewpoints they will have will be different from those of other children and they must be taught how to deal with and make sense of that fact. Whether it be by reaching out for external help or finding a community of parents that they can share tips with and grow together.
The world at large is in need of new processes, ideas and solutions to an ever growing slate of problems. These require a level of cooperation never before witnessed in human history, and we cannot get there by listening to the thoughts of those we only want to here. We must encourage an exchange of contrary and contradictory ideas, learn, understand and pick up what we need to advance our causes or put them to bed once and for all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 58
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 83
- In any field field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make meaningful contributions 83
- In all levels of education affection should be focused first on theory in order for students to understand the concepts rather than practical s to what extent do you agree or disagree 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...or colleagues that would be a source of worry for me. It speaks to a lack of diversity in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, then, for instance, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 14.8657303371 256% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2743.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 570.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81228070175 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65157606866 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522807017544 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9577043663 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.260869565 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7826086957 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192493026887 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462876535871 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469384728878 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990421523298 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469409895685 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...or colleagues that would be a source of worry for me. It speaks to a lack of diversity in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, then, for instance, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 14.8657303371 256% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2743.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 570.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81228070175 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65157606866 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522807017544 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9577043663 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.260869565 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7826086957 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192493026887 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462876535871 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469384728878 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990421523298 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469409895685 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.