Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Many would assert that scandals have several beneficial effects on our societies. In some senses, it is undeniable that scandal can draw attention from the public effectively. Only by focusing on the merits of scandals does the view overlook the vices of scandals from the perspectives of ineffectiveness and privacy.
Admittedly, few would disagree that it is scandals that can inform urgent issues fastest. When it comes to the the pace that people notice issues, it is less ordinary article or pedestrian opinions in the newspapers than sandals that can immediately spread the events. When some politicians received unjust money using apple boxes from businessmen in Korea 20 years ago, the images of apple boxes with dollars could attract most Koreans’ eyes in a day as a historic political scandal, leading to reforming laws of politicians’ ethics which improved the Korean political environment. The point here is that difficult reformation, seemed to never start, can be triggered by scandals.
Nevertheless, it does not necessarily mean that scandals always enhance the integrity and justice of societies. Considering too much focusing on stories itself not solving the problems, scandals often fail to cure societal issues, even worsen the problems. In fact, the fake data issues from doctor hwang, Korean biologist, in which a group of biologists managed by doctor hwang fabricated results became the hottest issue; however, they brought about only minor changes in guidelines for scientists, consequently failing to preclude subsequent scandals. This indicates that scandals are not a perfect way to increase social integrity.
Moreover, scandal can be dissected through the lens of privacy. Rather than concentrating on revising our customs which are not relevant today, most of sex scandals, sadly, make a myriad of rumors about what the couple did or why they do that, causing the additional hurt on the victims. This also implies that emphasis on scandals should be reconsidered.
To sum up, despite a wisdom of scandals as a way to draw attentions, the ineffectiveness as a problem-solver and the side-effect of privacy denote that scandals do not always promote societal health. Taken together, I cannot fully agree with the speaker’s view. Only if we were to ignore the importance of ineffectiveness and side-effects of scandals, could we conclude that scandals are the panacea of all social problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 10
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...urgent issues fastest. When it comes to the the pace that people notice issues, it is l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...urgent issues fastest. When it comes to the the pace that people notice issues, it is l...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...fectiveness as a problem-solver and the side-effect of privacy denote that scandals do not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37172774869 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98414622583 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594240837696 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6566966086 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.705882353 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224770080776 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631194870632 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363313424677 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113483693975 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351650638125 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...urgent issues fastest. When it comes to the the pace that people notice issues, it is l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...urgent issues fastest. When it comes to the the pace that people notice issues, it is l...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...fectiveness as a problem-solver and the side-effect of privacy denote that scandals do not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37172774869 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98414622583 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594240837696 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6566966086 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.705882353 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224770080776 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631194870632 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363313424677 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113483693975 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351650638125 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.