Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with the police or the military. Others think that women are less suitable for this kind of job. Discuss both views and give your opinion
People hold differing views about gender equality in embarking on occupations in armed force. While some individuals believe that females should not work as policewomen or soldiers, I am of an opinion that they should be given equal rights to the application in the army.
On one hand, there are several convincing explanations why women are less suitable for joining armed force, chief of which is that they are weaker than male counterparts in physical health. From a genetic perspective, females are less physically strong than men, regardless of the professional training, in which physical strength is a prerequisite for the employment at some occupations such as infantry whose daily jobs are physically demanding activities like carrying heavy backpack, armor, travelling long distance. If women are assigned to a unit of infantry, they may find harder to load such heavy weight and run such a long distance, hence less effective work performance.
On the other hand, I firmly hold the view that women candidates can resolve problems requiring skillful tactics, especially in the situations where the task need to be done by personal and professional skills without resorting to violence. A case point is that when police deal with a bank robbery taking a gun and holding hostages, it is more advisable for a negotiation of a release of victims. However, this demands a deep understanding of criminal psychology and emotional control to manipulate the criminals to drop their guns and surrender. Additionally, there is a huge mount of scientific evidence proving that females are emotionally and psychologically smarter than men partners. For this reason, the presence of policewomen is of greater significance than male co-workers.
To sum up, both men and women candidates can have equal opportunity while applying their CV to the job in armed forces because of their advantages characterized by genders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | tsln7607 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-26 | vananhxh2005 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | vinay_vp372 | 72 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Scientist predict it in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to go to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...ntry, they may find harder to load such heavy weight and run such a long distance, hence les...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, while, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29180327869 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05870889112 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626229508197 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2974089791 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.727272727 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29253440558 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891661225121 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422178476551 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153463018581 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00927299294573 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.