Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. they say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement to what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more off their waist?
Massive amount of domestic disposal is one of the modern concerns people have these days. I strongly believe that by enforcing some regulations, the authorities can increase recycling by forcing people to do so and encouraging recycling companies to come up with creative ways of re-using the recycables.
Mandatory laws make poeple who own an opposed opinion toward recycling to fo so. As an example, some people might find recycling an useless act. Or perhaps they experience some difficulties while doing it. By making recycling a legal requirement, the government will be able to control these people. In this way, the public become more willing to do as they are told. So that they could avoid facing consequences such as paying fines.
Moreover, to have supporting laws and devoting some budget to recycling, leas to more creativity and innovation within recycling companies. Therefore, re-using domestic wastes will be easier and more efficient. Advances in the means of recycle leads people to be more enthusiastic about making the time and effort to recycle their wastes. Statistics show that recycling proportion in Germany is one of the highest in the world as they have regulations to give taxes to the recycling companies.
However, the government ought to find ways to internalize the recycling value in people, especially youngsters, since a lot of money and energy will be consumed to enforce the law of recycling unless people start to do it with no forces. This can happen through educating children at an early age as well as advertising recycling.
In conclusion, to lower the concern of recycling wastes from homes, the government has an important role of setting series of laws forcing people to recycle and enable companies to invent doable ways for it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | AATIF AIYUB SALEH | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | chathurika | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Noah1997 | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled they say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement to what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more off their waist 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ample, some people might find recycling an useless act. Or perhaps they experience...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15463917526 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81899231671 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1322629871 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432384145205 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141118811936 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837427053766 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247461743845 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514371259877 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.