Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Massive amount of domestic disposal is one of the modern concerns people have these days. I strongly of the opinion that by enforcing some regulations, the authorities can increase recycling by forcing people to do so and encouraging recycling companies to come up with creative ways of re-using the recycables.
People owining an opposed opinion toward recycling can be forced via mandetory laws. Some people might find recycling an useless act. Or perhaps they experience some difficulties while doing it. To avoid outcomes of disobeying laws, such as paying fines, the public will tend to recycle more often. Thus, presence of legal requirements which imposes consequences on people, can contribute to growth of recycling.
Moreover, supporting laws that detoves some budget to recycling companies increases the creativity and innovation within them. Therefore, by technology advances, re-using domestic wastes will be easier and more efficient. Statistics show that recycling proportion in Germany is one of the highest in the world as they have regulations to give taxes to the recycling companies.
However, the government ought to find ways to internalize the recycling value in people, since a lot of money and energy will be consumed to enforce the law of recycling unless people start to do it on their own. This can happen through educating children at an early age as well as advertising recycling. The outcome of this effort will be people who feel enthusiastic about recycling.
In conclusion, to lower the concern of recycling the government has a crucial role of setting series of laws, forcing people to recycle and enable companies to invent doable ways for it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 73 | view |
- some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give you 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the numbers of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... laws. Some people might find recycling an useless act. Or perhaps they experience...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28996282528 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86220729883 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594795539033 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5281265765 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364406556299 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12028363772 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728980577109 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208389158087 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183906155255 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.