The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who use restaurants in five distinct groups in the United States from 2003 to 2013.
It is obvious that the two groups included once a week and once or twice a month have the highest percentage among all groups and the peak is related to once or twice a month in 2013, while the two groups are no longer significant because people who go to restaurant every day and never are little.
As can be seen, although people who go to restaurants several times a week under 20% in 2006 and about 16 percent in 2003 and 2013 and it is under 15 percent in three 2003, 2006, and 2013 in a few times a year. The American residents like to eat their meals there once a week and once or twice a month which in first in 2006 reached a peak of approximately 35% and in the peak related 2013 same percentage, the two remaining groups are no longer significant.
As a result, people have a tendency to go to restaurants once a week or once or twice a month in the United States and go several times a week or a few times a year.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.20487804878 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4438683606 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439024390244 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1563410128 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.4 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105369347591 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073517755899 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04964256426 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817171870815 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444827185082 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.97 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.