Doctos role as educators
It is proposed that doctors should bear the responsibility for imparting healthcare-related knowledge to patients so that they can improve themselves. I disagree with this statement, despite acknowledging the reasons behind it.
Granted, proponents of doctors’ role as educators for patients may assert that doctors possess specialized knowledge with many years of experience regarding the healthcare realm, thereby easily aiding people in bettering both their physical and mental health. This assistance may include how to create a balanced diet or how to cope with stress and anxiety in such a competitive world. This assistance, undoubtedly, can help people improve their health more effectively. However, this perspective fails to factor in the complexity involved in such in-depth knowledge imparted by doctors, rendering this proposal difficult to achieve. Hardly understanding the knowledge required, patients cannot enhance their health based on doctors’ knowledge as a result.
Of course, there is also an argument that doctors can provide personalized health advice for each patient based on their medical conditions, ensuring a holistic approach to health improvement. For example, those who are diagnosed with cardiovascular disease can be taught the method of stabilizing their heartbeat and what should refrain from doing so as not to exacerbate the existing health problem. However, this perspective is myopic, overlooking the fact that health advice personalization can be challenging to provide for all, as each case requires a long process of examining, and researching before concluding a final and comprehensive roadmap to health enhancement. Such onus, if placed on doctors, could engender stress among them. Also, this approach may be ineffective in the long run, as doctors have other urgent problems to deal with such as operating patients.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for advocating the idea of doctors teaching people knowledge to better their health, I would contend that such a proposal will not come in handy, given the complexity of knowledge involved and the fact that specialized advice, suggested by some, will be impossible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-21 | tteruchan65 | 11 | view |
- In the past important knowledge about history and culture was stored in museums However today people can see everything on the internet without paying any money Therefore we no longer need museums To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 84
- Some people say that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games Others say that young people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- Online learning do pros outweigh cons 84
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies How does competition affect individuals Is it a positive or negative trend 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'providing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: providing
...vice personalization can be challenging to provide for all, as each case requires a long p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66768292683 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12701897897 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.191589609 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0278655206729 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00985851630861 0.084324248473 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341509022675 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0150792533508 0.151304729494 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261180329437 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'providing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: providing
...vice personalization can be challenging to provide for all, as each case requires a long p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66768292683 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12701897897 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.191589609 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0278655206729 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00985851630861 0.084324248473 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341509022675 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0150792533508 0.151304729494 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261180329437 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.