The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates how the urban population of four Asian countries has changed over the course of the past thirty years, while also presenting projections regarding future changes.
Overall, all countries, except for the Philippines, experienced an increase in the number of people living in cities from 1979 to 2020, and a surge in the urban population is expected for every country by 2040.
Regarding the 1970-2020 time span, the city population in Malaysia and Indonesia had the largest growth. Precisely, about a third of Malaysian were living in cities in 1970, with this figure growing to 80 percent of the population by 2020. Similarly, Indonesian city residents in 2020 was six times more than the respective figure in 1970. A different pattern emerged within Thailand and Philippines, as their city population growth rate plateaued from 1990 to 2020, remaining on slightly above 40 percent and 30 percent, respectively.
As for potential changes in the future, all countries are forecast to experience a sharp increase. Specifically, by 2040, the urban-rural population ratio will be eight in ten in Malaysia and six in ten in Indonesia. Thailand and Philippines will benefit from a similar upward trend, both peaking at a percentage of around 50.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | 61 | view |
- Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, similarly, so, third, while, as for, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26960784314 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92953168639 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0635476453 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263937114017 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101352503581 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053497955983 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14026157212 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477235126446 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.