Some children spend hours every day on smartphones.
Why is this the case?
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The mobile phones have become an inseparable aspect of human lives and children have become attached to using these devices on a daily basis. This development may be due to the provided convenience for the parents, and the pleasant gaming exeperiences for the children, which I believe to be a positive feature of today’s world if used for educational purposes.
The reason may lie in the convenience and the variety of the activities smartphones provide. Specifically, phones have the ability to keep children busy and entertained without the parents’ intervention. As a result, parents may find it convenient to substitute their children’s active play time with mobile games, as this approach could allow them to free up time in their schedule. Simultanaously, children may find these devices more attractive than traditional hobbies such as painting and playing outside, because mobile games are designed in a way to be as engaging as possible since they leverage bright colors, joyful sounds, and point-based reward systems to appeal to children.
This recent change in children’s play style may be considered positive provided parents take an active and conscious role in managing the gaming experience of their children. By installing educational and informative applications, parents have the opportunity to transform the smartphones into invaluable learning tools that could enhance the childrens’ problem-solving abilities, critical thinking, and mental agility. For example, numerous math, physics, and programming games are available for various age groups, developed specially with the goal of teaching essential and beneficial skills through gamified interfaces.
In conclusion, digital devices including smartphones have become an integral part of parenting and chilhood. By adapting a conscious approach, parents could leverage on this development and transform the childrens’ involvement with technology into beneficial and worthwhile experiences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | Celina Pei | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | 123456abcxyz | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Elahe13 | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-17 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | hanifah | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting 78
- Now a days many people choose to be self employed rather than work for a company Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantage of being self employed 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85862068966 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16979089473 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8698652526 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.454545455 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157025993094 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642233321579 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040726449273 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107742842233 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140206766102 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.