The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the weekly income distributed by families in an unknown country in the two years 1968 and 2018.
Overall, spending on housing, transport, and leisure went up, while the expenditures on food, fuel and power, clothing and footware, and personal goods went down. However, household goods seemed to be unchanged throughout fifty years.
In 1968, it was food that had the most spending by those unspecified families with 35%. However, after five decades, this percentage decreased sharply by nearly 20%. A similar trend occurred in the proportion of clothing and footwear, and personal goods which were 10% and 8% respectively. Otherwise, fuel and power witnessed a slight downward in its expenditures which was approximately 6% in 1968 and 4% in 2018.
After fifty years, in 2018, there was a dramatic change in the spending on leisure leading this item to rank in the top one with about 22%. Also increasing in this period, housing and transport had significant growth from 10% and 8% to about 18% and 14% respectively. Surprisingly, household goods demonstrated their stability at roughly 8%, albeit it was fifty years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004 89
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... to rank in the top one with about 22%. Also increasing in this period, housing and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17368421053 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87796577127 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0935935758 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117280396915 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462563422461 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623997620569 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085842674344 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791709062082 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... to rank in the top one with about 22%. Also increasing in this period, housing and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17368421053 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87796577127 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0935935758 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117280396915 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462563422461 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623997620569 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085842674344 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791709062082 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.