The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average monthly variation in the cost of copper, nickel, and zinc throughout the year 2014.
Overall, after a year, while the change in the price of copper and nickel decreased, zinc witnessed a slight increase. Beginning as an element that had the highest price rate, nickel turned out to be the third-rank element at the end of 2014.
It can be seen from the chart that nickel, in January 2014, was the most expensive metal with 6%. However, after this month, it started to decline and reached the bottom of the chart in June 2014, which was -3%. In October, nickel once again witnessed a decrease in its price, but it was still higher than in June, at -2%. There was an increase one month after that, then it stayed unchanged at 1% till the end of 2014.
Ranked in the top 2 metals that had the highest cost, at 2%, Copper then began to fall to about -0.5% in May. After a month remained stable, it rose to 1% in July and ended at about 1.8% in December in its percentage change in price. Different from the other two metals, zinc, at the beginning, was about 1% in its variation level; however, it did not fall right after, it showed a small increase in February. From March to October, although there was a small fluctuation in the middle period, the proportion change in its cost still went down and reached -1% in two months, which is June and October. Yet, in the end, zinc displayed a significant change when it turned out to be the metal that had the most variation level in the change of the price, at 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- TOPIC It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Plan A shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43006993007 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27694337288 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9284318045 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.583333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143669407037 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640992068792 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349116938863 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102756601914 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224657313823 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.