Nowadays, an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
These days, it is apparent to see an increase in the number of individuals who prefer to have substitute sources of treatments than to have support from ordinary doctors when they get sick. In my opinion, this development is negative for people due to a lack of accurate and effective solutions.
It is undeniable that educated doctors are likely to provide more accurate treatments to their patients. Before being real doctors, those talents have to be educated for about 8 years in related education systems. They are taught carefully about how to diagnose to find out a correct symptom. Furthermore, official doctors will treat their patients equally by their hearts and souls rather than being controlled by other factors, including social status, money, etcetera. Take Mister Nguyen Van Khue who is an officer in Danang as an example. He used to be diagnosed inaccurately when using an alternative treatment provided by his mother instead of going to a reliable hospital. Consequently, his sickness was worse day by day and could not be cured when coming to the hospital after that.
In addition, medicines given by the hospital and well-educated doctors are more effective than most of those from unknown healers. Healthcare is the most important field in the world as it can affect human beings’ lives. Therefore, all the medicines have been examined well in order to ensure that the receivers can minimize the side effects of those treatments. In Vietnam, some individuals living in minority regions when get a cough, they will use wild ingredients, such as leaves, and mushrooms, as sources of medicine by boiling and drinking them every day. The Ministry of Health always warns its citizens not to utilize those ingredients as they can cause bad damage when they are taken wrongly.
In summary, I do agree that choosing alternative methods rather than treatments from professional doctors to recover from sickness will be a bad choice because it can badly harm people’s health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | InamAli | 92 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | emkay | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 56
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, so, therefore, well, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125382263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7476821715 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9158486001 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202583487955 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625708855567 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546609410712 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125418190693 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413479926916 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, so, therefore, well, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125382263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7476821715 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9158486001 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202583487955 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625708855567 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546609410712 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125418190693 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413479926916 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.