In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is not uncommon for someone to argue that people can't reach a high achievement if they don't stand on the shoulders of ancestors in the field. The statement makes sense, as it takes the past achievements into account which can bring experience to the new research. However, it is not always sensible under some circumstance. For the most cleverest people, they may come up with original ideal. In fact, I disagree with the argument.
Although, for most of the researchers, it is of great significance to learn from the past paper in order to cover the blank place within the field. If they are not supposed to look up in the previous experiment, they would do repetitive job in vain. Another reason for firstly studying the past achievements is that they would provide rich resource and experience so that can improve the efficiency when conducting new research.
However, learning from the past achievements may lead to some problems. For example, one would copy what other people have already done, and explains that the product is innovative. In addition, if more and more people choose to mimic other's work, there won't be any development among the field where people study. In that case, there will be no achievement anymore.
Moreover, think about a question, through human's history, who would become the first one to create a new field for more scholars to study? When Confucius created the Confucianism, which is a significant contribution to the world, no past achievement he could refer. In order world, for someone especially who is remarkably excellent, he or she may not need to learn from the past experience.
In conclusion, I suppose that for most of the people, they have to learn from the past achievement for the resources and experience, but there still exist some genius examples. So I disagree with the statement that it is impossible to achieve remarkable goal without the ancestors help.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 58
- Claim People who say they are bored should look inward rather than blaming the circumstances in which they find themselves Reason Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self motivation Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...common for someone to argue that people cant reach a high achievement if they dont s...
^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e cant reach a high achievement if they dont stand on the shoulders of ancestors in ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'cleverest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: cleverest
...nsible under some circumstance. For the most cleverest people, they may come up with original ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the cleverest'.
Suggestion: most the cleverest
...nsible under some circumstance. For the most cleverest people, they may come up with original ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...reover, think about a question, through humans history, who would become the first one...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...e or she may not need to learn from the past experience. In conclusion, I suppose that for m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99068322981 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77933654381 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5386739182 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217150646977 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735627605914 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574114614947 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125409784214 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240722267123 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.