Unemployment among young people is a serious problem. One solution has been suggested is to shorten the working week. What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages? Do you think this policy should apply to just young workers or the whole workforce？
Recently, young unemployment has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that short working weeks are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the short working weeks' standpoint, strong policies are bound up with young workers, which indicates they both lead to workforce abilities and unemployed individuals. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between long working weeks and efficient policies as well as an exponential increase in workforce issues. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of workforce abilities is correlated positively with not only short working weeks but also young unemployment.
Within the realm of short working weeks, without the slightest doubt, strong policies attribute to young workers, in that it would come down to workforce abilities, unemployed individuals, and long working weeks. A salient example of such attribution is efficient policies, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take workforce issues for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint unemployment individuals' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of young unemployment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "All's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of young unemployment are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-28 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is foolish To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Should marketing in companies producing consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'weeks'' or 'week's'?
Suggestion: weeks'; week's
...out this essay. From the short working weeks standpoint, strong policies are bound u...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'Alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74297188755 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20286097329 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63453815261 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8866349819 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204834778196 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792508362232 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344362386519 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118741043447 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256292829787 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.