The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
The flow chart shows how waste bottles is recycled.
It is clear that there are nine distinct stages in this process, from the initial collection of waste plastic bottles to the eventual production of usable bottles.
The first stage in the plastic bottle recycling process begins with people placing them in recycling bins. Next, those bottles are collected and transported to recycling centres where workers sort out recyclable plastic bottles from others. Selected bottles are then compressed and converted into large blocks which are, afterward, sent through crushing machines. The crushing machine produces small pieces which are then washed before sending them into another machine to make plastic pellets. In the following stage, the plastic pellets are heated to form the raw material. The raw material will be collected and packed. Finally, the raw materials are used to fabricate various types of products for use.
To sum up, we could say that we can product different and important items from waste plastic bottles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-26 | Lethanh54 | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34969325153 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37761525723 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656441717791 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3022662162 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313857466481 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112577891812 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954111342317 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157501480644 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802719241553 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.