The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total
percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country. Summarise the information by
selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrate the information about the percentage of flims that was released and the percentage of ticket sales in the categories of drama, comedy, fantasy and romance, in two separate years, 1996 and 2000.
Looking at the data set in 1996 in more detail, it is clear that 26% of movie that was released was the drama category, is the highest among all types. Comedy, fantasy and romance types are 20%, 17%, 6% respectively. Comedy types of movie ticket sales were around 20%, is the highest number in the chart. This is followed by drama at 16%, fantasy at 3%, and romance at 5% being sale. Fantasy flim sells the lowest number of tickets.
Turning to the data set in 2000, it is evident that number of cenema released was increased by 13% in drama category from the 1996, is the highest number. Comedy and fantasy movie also increased slightly was 25% and 16%. But the romance movie releasd was leveled as compared to 1996.
Comedy cenema ticket sales was escalated by 4% from 1996, also remain the highest sale. Drama and fantasy types of movie ticket sales was increased but slightly. However, romance category ticket sales dropped to 2%, which is the lowest sale.
Overall it can be seen that the drama type of film has the highest number of films that was released in both 1996 and 2000. Additionally, the number of tickets that was sold in comedy category was the maximum among all types in 1996 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-22 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | Raju godara | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | TranMinhDuc | 77 | view |
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment What are the causes and possible solutions 73
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption of coffee and where the profit goes around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 50
- The line graph shows the percentages of Australian exports with four countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67193675889 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2332470526 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430830039526 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4748753238 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4285714286 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140058946975 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061953772511 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556870394627 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108425272387 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618355629079 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67193675889 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2332470526 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430830039526 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4748753238 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4285714286 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140058946975 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061953772511 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556870394627 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108425272387 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618355629079 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.