The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries.
The given bar chart gives information about the rate of students being fluent in a second language in six nations namely China, Romania, Thailand, India, Russia, and Vietnam in the year of 2000.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart, it is clear that India was by far the country that had the highest proportion of students proficient in a foreign language. In addition, the females in these six countries both had a tendency to be more fluent in an alternative language than the males, except for Thailand.
According to the men, the rate of Indian learners being proficient in a non-native language was the highest, at about 56%, while the opposite was true for Chinese, with the figure at roughly 17%. At the same time, approximately 42% of Romanian students proficient in a foreign language were male. Additionally, males accounted for about 32%, 35%, and 39% of the total learners being fluent in a second language in Thailand, Russia, and Vietnam respectively.
In terms of women, the percentage of pupils fluent in a second language in India remained the highest, at about 68%, and was the highest figure in the chart. Meanwhile, the figures for China and Thailand were significantly lower, at roughly 32% each. Moreover, 65%, 42%, and 56% were the rate of Romanian, Russian, and Vietnamese learners being proficient in a second language respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | klnghinhh | view | |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | stanie calitex | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- The pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 and 1991 67
- The plans below show the South Wing of Walton Museum in 2008 and in 2012 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00877192982 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77959466589 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7719293182 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246905940157 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112098771441 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662723385073 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164365189751 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288273330794 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.