The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
In 1958 In 2008
Working 33 42
Sleeping 32 25
Going out (with friends/family) 19 6
Relaxing at home 8 13
Other interests or playing sports 6 8
Travel to work 2 8
The pie charts compare how the infromation about the working time how spent the adult on different six categories activities in a specific country changed in two separate years, 1958 and 2008.
Overall, working ability person invested a significant time on working duty, that’s why working’s share had a dominance in bothe years. Conversely, the spending time on other activities varied substantially between two years.
In 1958, the top portion three duties were working, sleeping, and going out, accounting for 33%, 32, and 19%, respectively. Working was the predominant in both years, but a significant increase in 2008 at 42%, with sleeping close behind 25%, however, it had an enormous went down. Going out (with friends/ family) was important in 1958, but in 2008 it had not have, with decreasing from 19% to 6%.
The remaining activities collectively accounted for around one-twenth of the total in 1958. Relaxing at home and other interests or playing sports were more significant for the new generation, increasing from 8% to 13% and 6% to 8%, respectively. Though travel to work had been minimal pronounced in 1958, it had a considerable value for the new generation and reached at just under one-tenth. Among the smaller categories, Relaxing at home were more prioritized in 2008, followed by interests or playing sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | Sajib Ahamed | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-21 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
- This is questio The graphs below show the different reasons of the groups of students to choose Dorrifod University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Age 18 24 Age 25 and over Close 73
- The diagram below shows the process of getting a driving license Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc 67
- The diagram below shows the process of getting a driving licence Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...portant in 1958, but in 2008 it had not have, with decreasing from 19% to 6%. The...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23148148148 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92498812913 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.059274775 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21810723689 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866154416452 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726528025431 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147277796531 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820473545847 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...portant in 1958, but in 2008 it had not have, with decreasing from 19% to 6%. The...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23148148148 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92498812913 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.059274775 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21810723689 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866154416452 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726528025431 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147277796531 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820473545847 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.