The diagram below shows a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007.
The presented maps depict the changes to the layout of a small domestic museum and its surroundings between 1957 and 2007.
Overall, as well as becoming less environmentally friendly, the museum diversified its room and came equipped with a new car park.
In 1957, there was a small path leading to the museum’s entrance hall that branches off from the main road. The museum could be accessed by an entrance hall on the south side, which led visitors directly to the national history exhibition, while immediately to the right of this entrance hall was a museum storeroom, and to the left was a local history room. Moreover, there was a large garden with many different genres of trees outside the museum.
By 2007, the library had been transformed completely. Specifically, the small path branching from the main road was removed, while a new car park was constructed outside the museum. The entrance hall became the entrance that led to a museum shop instead of a local history room in 1957. Adjacent to the museum shop was the reception, which led visitors directly to the local history room. At the right corner of the museum, a new café was built next to the reception and local history room. At the top of the museum, special exhibitions and an education center were scaled down and consolidated in the same size as the local history room. Meanwhile, trees were removed to serve the modernization and diversification of the museum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Nguyen Anh Quach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | ramnu kaur | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | hadgrid | view |
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people by age group visiting the cinema at least once per month in one particular country between 1978 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...Moreover, there was a large garden with many different genres of trees outside the museum. B...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86991869919 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74241754462 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491869918699 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6961583603 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265004982609 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114554548875 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800724838522 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195825053994 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103245217511 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.