Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. do benefits of this outweigh the problems
To overcome the obstacles of communication worldwide, a new globally recognized language is needed, which has led a group of people to invent one. While there are some negative consequences of this development, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are numerous benefits to acquiring knowledge of a new language. Firstly, it can overcome the challenges of building networks around the world. As technologies advance, exchanging information, ideas, and research with others becomes essential. For example, when the COVID-19 vaccine was developed by a German company, they disseminated the formula and vaccine to all countries, both poor and rich. Without proper networking and communication, this would not have been possible. In this case, learning a new language is necessary. Secondly, learning a new language creates the opportunity to gain deep knowledge about new cultures and traditions. This can foster geographical and cultural understanding. Moreover, to study abroad, a new globally recognized language is essential for communication between students and teachers. Nowadays, different language assessment exams are conducted to evaluate language proficiency.
On the other hand, there are diverse languages available in different countries. A single language may not be sufficient to communicate and fully understand various cultures and traditions. Additionally, it is very <span class="highlighter highlight-on">arduous</span> and time-consuming to master the vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation of a foreign language.
In conclusion, inventing a new language for global communication is highly effective. Although the task is laborious, it can bring success in various ways and enhance numerous abilities, which outweigh its drawbacks. I believe every person should learn at least one foreign language.
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- The graph below shows the number of people taking part in a wildlife survey in Britain between 2001 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ative consequences of this development, I would argue that these are outweighed b...
^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...bilities, which outweigh its drawbacks. I believe every person should learn at le...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97407407407 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.81112550838 2.80592935109 136% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618518518519 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2774176102 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6111111111 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301565055414 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874371703455 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739176563772 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175063952302 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701590616542 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.75 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.