The Charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009
The bars indicates the important ways of using means of transport for individuals traveling to one university over the period of 5 years, commencing from 2004.
Overall, it is clear that there were upward trends in the proportion of taking bus, bicycle,and train, while the percentage of cars and walking for traveling exhibited a downward trend over the period. It is noticeable that traveling by bus was the most popular method during the period.
In 2004, the percentage of car used for traveling stood at 51 percent, making it the highest figure among these other ways. Moreover, the proportion of car used was greater than bicycles, with exactly 33 compared to 9 percent. Finally, the percentages of car and walking was used by individuals whose figure fell within a range from 3 to 4 percent during that time.
Afterwards, the figure for bus usage for traveling experienced a substantial increase at about 46 percent, making it the highest ranking of individual preference. The percentage of commuting by car was twice as much as of bicycles , with respective figures being exactly 28 and 16 percent. Furthermore, the proportions of walking and cars increased slightly, with 4 and 6 percent to the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-10 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to work for a big company instead of a small family run business What are the advantages and disadvantages 73
- These days an increasing number of people in many cities know little about their neighbors and does not have a sense of community What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 67
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 78
- Technology can bring many benefits But it can also cause social and environmental problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'indicate'.
Suggestion: indicate
The bars indicates the important ways of using means of tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in the proportion of taking bus, bicycle,and train, while the percentage of cars ...
^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In 2004, the percentage of car used for traveling stood at 51 percent, makin...
^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... by car was twice as much as of bicycles , with respective figures being exactly 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03431372549 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87250396007 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0991775662 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107686852429 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532895500758 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700767908599 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895181483499 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782635370104 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.