Fewer people attended movie than any other years
Author is suggesting that in a memo of an advertising director it is said that more budget in advertising will lead to a greater success of a movie next time but it is full of flaws and based on abysmal assumptions.
First assumption that the an advertising director had made is that according to a report during a last year during last year fewer people attended super screen produced movies than any other year but not stating anything about the competitors.
Are any other movies were having better critic reviews than super screen produced movies?
Second question which is still unanswered is that on which day or in which season the movies were released compare to past year? For example it is generally seen that at the time of the festivals people are more likely to go to cinema rather than ordinary days.
Thirdly positive reviewers are increased but at how much extent? It is not clearly stating that up to which percentage the reviewers are increased and certainly we can’t say that the movie was better than the past without knowing about the actual percentage change and as well we don’t know if new critics had come and reviewed better and still people are believing on the old critics who may had not positively responded.
Fourthly he is saying that lack of awareness but on which basis we can presume that people are not aware and it is the only reason behind the not promising result is still unclear. Other question is that how much budget the production company had allocated in the fields like music, direction, acting and of course advertising?
Fifthly which actors had worked this time? Because some people have predilection about specific actors so we can't certainly say that by increasing the budget of the advertising the profit will also increase.
Sixthly we are not sure about the people if the new better movie with even more positive reviews had came with it than they are likely to see that movie rather than this movie so many questions are still unclear.
Therefore I can conclude that the recommendation of the argument is totally based upon the so many unclear assumptions and without knowing the answers of these questions one can't certainly say that this memo of the advertising director is fully valid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Mahima1902 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
- Argument Topic:The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, wouldbe completely filled within five years. 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company."Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appli 66
- Issue Topic - True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company."Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appli 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
... assumptions. First assumption that the an advertising director had made is that a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o to cinema rather than ordinary days. Thirdly positive reviewers are increase...
^^^
Line 8, column 364, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...me and reviewed better and still people are believing on the old critics who may had not posi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 111, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...redilection about specific actors so we cant certainly say that by increasing the bu...
^^^^
Line 14, column 103, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...vie with even more positive reviews had came with it than they are likely to see tha...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e so many questions are still unclear. Therefore I can conclude that the recom...
^^^
Line 16, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... many questions are still unclear. Therefore I can conclude that the recommendation ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 176, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...wing the answers of these questions one cant certainly say that this memo of the adv...
^^^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...advertising director is fully valid.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'for example', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226829268293 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.187804878049 0.15541462614 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0951219512195 0.0836205057962 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0780487804878 0.0520304965353 150% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0341463414634 0.0272364105082 125% => OK
Prepositions: 0.148780487805 0.125424944231 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0560975609756 0.0416121511921 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51870261884 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0170731707317 0.026700313972 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0951219512195 0.113004496875 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0146341463415 0.0255425247493 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0219512195122 0.0127820249294 172% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2297.0 2731.13054187 84% => OK
No of words: 387.0 446.07635468 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9354005168 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346253229974 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227390180879 0.287650121315 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.157622739018 0.208842608468 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105943152455 0.135150697306 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51870261884 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 207.018472906 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.469332199767 102% => OK
Word variations: 51.3778846963 52.1807786196 98% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 29.7692307692 23.2022227129 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0603888705 57.7814097925 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.692307692 141.986410481 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7692307692 23.2022227129 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.724660767414 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 5.14285714286 175% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 3.58251231527 251% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 52.5082488571 51.9672348444 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.43902439024 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126955942219 0.441005458295 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141311523747 0.135418324435 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0696004681456 0.0829849096947 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.791071094829 0.58762219726 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.235845047 0.147661913831 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589145854523 0.193483328276 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659012749295 0.0970749176394 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.198805943989 0.42659136922 47% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0849413160753 0.0774707102158 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784100280695 0.312017818177 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681575531818 0.0698173142475 98% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 6.46551724138 139% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.