Some items (such as clothes or furniture) can be made by hand or by machine. Which do you prefer - items made by hand or items made by machine? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice.
When it comes to the issue the choice item which is made by hand or by machine, some people believe that is better to purchase items made by machines. However, others maintain the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reasons.
The first and most important reason is that financial issue. The price plays a significant role in our options and causes we choose wisely. From the economical angle, production goods by hand not only are time-consuming but also increase the cost of outcomes. However, machines allow us to mass production, which saves time and decreases the expenses. I think that a small example can give some light on this topic. In my country, people tend to cover the house floor by carpets. Most of them prefer to use machine-made carpet instead of a handmade carpet because the difference of price between these so great that they cannot afford it.
There is also a more subtle point we must consider. Item is generated by machines is the standard. As we all know, standard products have less risk of failures by manufacturing mistake, because they are assembling by robots, sensors, and computer. I think that there in no better example than one who purchases a car from Rolls Royce Company, who produces cars by hand. If he needs spare pieces for his car, he hardly could find them in some special stores. Handmade goods usually do not base on common standard methods, and this cause repairing them is difficult. Overall, the biggest advantage of products of machines lies in the fact that producers use standardized methods for manufacture them.
Apart from the points I made above, because of the standardized methods used to manufacture some item, producers can offer more extended warranty to their products. A tree hundred dollars watch probably can work proper for over ten years, and producer can offer a warranty longer than would offer a famous watch producer from Switzerland, who makes all of these watches by hand.
Taking into account all of these factors, we may reach the conclusion that an item made by machine is better. The main reason for this selection is that price, and warranties, as well as standardized methods for manufacture them. Of course, as an English proverb goes “coin has two sides,” those who take the opposite view are partly reasonable that an item made by hand is unique and has more quality. Nonetheless, I think that its benefits outweigh dangers. Last but not least, let us hope to have access the high quality and low-cost commodities, which are made by machines in the future.
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 58
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 80
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 94
- The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer. 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Games are as important for adults as they are for children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndardized methods for manufacture them. Apart from the points I made above, beca...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...nded warranty to their products. A tree hundred dollars watch probably can work proper ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...sh proverb goes 'coin has two sides,' those who take the opposite view are p...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich are made by machines in the future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'well', 'apart from', 'i think', 'of course', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237721021611 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.151277013752 0.158761421928 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0884086444008 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.049115913556 0.046263068375 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0550098231827 0.0685040099705 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127701375246 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0275049115914 0.0351676179071 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61116406566 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0157170923379 0.0309702414327 51% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.098231827112 0.0887237588012 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176817288802 0.0209618222197 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0157170923379 0.0139019557991 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2672.0 2387.08602151 112% => OK
No of words: 450.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93777777778 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335555555556 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257777777778 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186666666667 0.174417080927 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0955555555556 0.112833075102 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61116406566 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.524397521467 107% => OK
Word variations: 67.3784512008 59.2087087015 114% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5533526081 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7532073766 48.84282405 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.88 120.699889404 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.5533526081 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 43.7777777778 45.7405998639 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.53846153846 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259000584615 0.300154397459 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0668247282639 0.103427244359 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0706916062724 0.0752933317313 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.423517209574 0.497263757937 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133912411786 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753656424214 0.114077575197 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890026432526 0.0781384742642 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.252579824224 0.336927656856 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0739150422347 0.067059652881 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176397645971 0.210909579961 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757068445889 0.0618886996521 122% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.