Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises a controversial issue whether, the assertion that many revolutionary achievements are rather accidental or not. Indisputably, there might be a case where it is possible that whiles looking for somthing else one finds somthing else. Nevertheless, the statement that due to accidental fortune the innovations are engendered is not suitable. Thus, i woud disagree with the assertion that revolutionary innovations are just out of fluke.
Firstly, it ispossible that the base for the research is something else, and the results found are rather different because of the reason that the base of the research was different. To illustrate, let us take an example of the relation between the stress and the human body reactions to it. Now, the research is on the stress and if you are looking for an answer in the geneticism of the body than naturally you are gonna find something related to it and not the stress factors. So, it is imperative that the struggle for the answer must be in the right path.
Secondly, it is possible that the result of the experiment undertaken is related to the idea, which was theoretically not proven but than, does that mean the results signifies something else that was not expected? Because, there is only theoretical analysis available, it only provides with the possibility that it might happen, but than the fianl result might just not be the same. For example, there is a theory that after the extiction of all the honeybees on the earth, the humans will extinct within the span of four years. It has no proof whether, it might be true or might be not.
Admittedly, there are many discoveries which were made while looking for something else. One of the most famous example is of Vasco Di Gama, he set course to find america and instead, reached India. But, here also it is common sense, that when he went to find it, he obviously wasn't sure about what would he find? Rather, he would find something or not? It was just a theory that there might exist another world.
In sum the assertion of the author that most discoveries are out of fortune is indefensible. As, it is contrary to the overwhelming evidence that suggests that it is not the case. Therefore, as long as some measurements are involved, or some cases are considered the aseertion that the innovations are not just the result of fluke holds credit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 54
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a response in wh 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times."Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now ta 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of Excello Food Markets."In 90 towns where Excello has food markets, natural-food stores specializing in organic food products — products containing no chemical preservatives and made with foods 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...t when he went to find it, he obviously wasnt sure about what would he find? Rather, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies are out of fortune is indefensible. As, it is contrary to the overwhelming evi...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.177242888403 0.240241500013 74% => OK
Verbs: 0.161925601751 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0678336980306 0.0880659088768 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0919037199125 0.0497285424764 185% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0503282275711 0.0444667217837 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124726477024 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0284463894967 0.0406280797675 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72676718392 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.019693654267 0.030933414821 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115973741794 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0218818380744 0.0249443105267 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0175054704595 0.0148568991511 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2366.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 408.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79901960784 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.299019607843 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230392156863 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18137254902 0.200843997647 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127450980392 0.132149295362 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72676718392 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487745098039 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 53.2795282092 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4 23.380412469 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8365574624 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.380412469 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.674092028746 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 43.4392156863 51.4728631049 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.08633093525 1.64882698954 66% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484795099541 0.391690518653 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142946413713 0.123202303941 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.122320745771 0.077325440228 158% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.584915498362 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163695373185 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197717580813 0.161403998019 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101293362977 0.0892212321368 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371418644252 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.145367938429 0.0692045440612 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320298460851 0.275328986314 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787601373095 0.0653680567796 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.