Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today
People often wish to get a time machine, to go to the past and change something or to see the future and witness those significant changes, which will happen. Ability to alter or to predict is considered very arduous or rather impossible, but people believe that possibility of this opportunity can become a resonance in history of humanity. On the other hand, the remaining majority of people assert that even knowing about the past will not help people to change anything in their life and at the same time to make some important decisions. Considering these two contradictory opinions, it is important to look through both of them and explore the question why the past is not able to impact or in contrast, how it contributes to the present.
Attention, cautiousness and wisdom, very popular and famous words that are advised to people and among the people. However, the tiny minority of them can listen to these words after hearing, because the numerous used to just suffer than make a decision. The mistake, which was made in the past, definitely will be repeated in the future, inasmuch as leopard cannot change its spots. For example, the politician who cannot forestall an avoidable problem, have not analyzed the history where his predecessors made the same mistakes. Simultaneously with this fact, the same politician who even if sort out the previous faults, will make other wrong decisions, because his inner desires always will be above his intelligence.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”
(Albert Einstein)
On the other hand, another part of people thinks that the past is the best chance to be taught and to improve the future. “Incredible ability to avoid each mistake at the same time is impossible”. The experience of human being upgrades constantly and yesterday do not pass without useful impacts on today. Take for instance the child, who is not ingenious enough, after the first injury from the stove, understand and make decision that it is bad for him and never touch it. As against to the children the mature people who have the better approach to the problem, especially to those which they experienced in the past, are capable to derive useful decisions from the past and using this information to find the best solution for today.
“Everything what I have missed became everything what I have lost. Each word, which I did not learn in the past, turned to the water drop in the desert where I am now. I was stupid because I gave that what I cannot return, but I am not so stupid to let myself to repeat the same mistake. Looking to the past I have changed and this transformation has become the best decision, which I have ever made” (Yusif Huseyn)
Finally, in spite of a huge difference that exists between people with the different characters, we can distinguish them into two categories. First, the human being who do not believe that transformation is possible and say that improving does not depend on the past, and second, those, who do not want to believe to the stability and claim that their today has to be better than their yesterday.
- The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper:“Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for more than 70 years.Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum:“On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year fileda complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1percent of our 66
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves socially and culturally. 16
- The MegaTek Corporation’s vice president of marketing made the followingstatement to the company’s board of directors:MegaTek has been losing market share to UltraCorp for three years straight.Customer surveys suggest that consumers perceive UltraCorp 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People often wish to get a time machine,...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., how it contributes to the present. Attention, cautiousness and wisdom, very...
^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...: the universe and human stupidity; and Im not sure about the universe.' Al...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd Im not sure about the universe.' Albert Einstein On the other hand,...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he universe.' Albert Einstein On the other hand, another part of peopl...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I have ever made' Yusif Huseyn Finally, in spite of a huge difference t...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'in spite of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204545454545 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.162337662338 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0811688311688 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0519480519481 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0454545454545 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0941558441558 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0340909090909 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74902339561 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0470779220779 0.030933414821 152% => OK
Particles: 0.00162337662338 0.0016655270985 97% => OK
Determiners: 0.108766233766 0.0997080785238 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0178571428571 0.0249443105267 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0324675324675 0.0148568991511 219% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3188.0 2732.02544248 117% => OK
No of words: 540.0 452.878318584 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9037037037 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335185185185 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235185185185 0.280924506359 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162962962963 0.200843997647 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109259259259 0.132149295362 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74902339561 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 219.290929204 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 61.7526568497 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.4210526316 23.380412469 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3356416925 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.789473684 141.124799967 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4210526316 23.380412469 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.674092028746 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 51.9395711501 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.28125 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416022371097 0.391690518653 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104775206972 0.123202303941 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0608871279498 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.59234537839 0.547984918172 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163209725385 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161733728726 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101545423855 0.0892212321368 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.351747458686 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0977618888396 0.0692045440612 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237212792136 0.275328986314 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997361437181 0.0653680567796 153% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.