The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
The line graph compares how many books were read by both genders at Burnaby Public Library over a period of 4 years.
It is clear that the number of books read by men increased over the period shown. Additionally, there was a significant fall in the figure for women in 2014, although women read more books than men from 2011 to 2013.
In 2011, the number of books read by women was highest, at about 5000 books, while the figure for men was noticeably lower, at 3000 books. One year later, women reader grew considerably to 8000 books, whereas men readers saw only a small rise to 4000 books in 2012.
Between 2012-2013, the figure for both genders went up to the same point of 10000 books. After that, the number of books read by men rose sharply to a peak of 14000 books in 2014 and became the highest figure in the line graph. At the same time, the figure for women declined rapidly by 8000 books.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. 78
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 84
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 737.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3869047619 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0906249947 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8502296895 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.125 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427525027825 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188414869628 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105117222878 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269934221872 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627006250983 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.