Advantages and Disadvantages of Giving Heavy Punishment to Reduce School Violence
Some people believe that inflict heavy punishment on naughty students who behave aggressively towards their friends is an efficient solution to prevent school violence. However, in reality, such a solution has both merits and demerits.
On the one hand, it is true that people see some benefits of meting out harsh punishment to reduce school violence rates. One of the good points worth being mentioned is that it raises pugnacious pupils’ awareness about the serious consequences of disobeying peacekeeping rules at school. In this way, that level of chastisement could also serve as a deterrent to others students and preclude them from doing similar misbehavior. Furthermore, it has been shown that severely disciplinary actions would help teacher control students who violate school rules and regulations more easily and make those children respect the authority on pain of punishment.
On the other hand, heavy punishment has some noteworthy negative effects on the lives of students. Firstly, it deprives violent students of a chance to be understood, to be sympathized, to change himself and to reintegrate back into society. For example, a pugnacious pupil who is suspended from school and despised by his family and friends is likely take revenge of society because he believes that he is outcast and he finds his life no longer meaningful. Secondly, some kinds of heavy punishment like corporal or physical punishment would create an atmosphere of fear and anger at school, cause mind and body injuries and set a bad example for students.
In conclusion, people should be aware of the positive and negative impacts of inflicting harsh punishment on violent students to find the best way to reduce school violence
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-07 | lilyinyourarea | 84 | view |
2022-11-17 | WindOlivia | 89 | view |
2022-07-27 | linhdk35 | 84 | view |
2022-06-07 | Cicihg | 48 | view |
2021-12-20 | mnaufaln | 84 | view |
- NECESSITY OF TEACHERS IN CLASSROOM 78
- Forested Land [Ielts task 1] 73
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 61
- Many people use distance learning programmes ( study material, the internet, post, TV, the internet, etc) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or university.To what extend do you agree or disa 36
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to decrease the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32608695652 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84646130221 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61231884058 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3376040999 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232914765863 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876279839653 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811362250717 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147634623841 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319147296421 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.